Editing
15 Shocking Facts About Free Evolution You ve Never Known
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
What is Free Evolution?<br><br>Free evolution is the concept that natural processes can cause organisms to develop over time. This includes the creation of new species and the change in appearance of existing ones.<br><br>This has been demonstrated by many examples of stickleback fish species that can thrive in fresh or saltwater and walking stick insect types that prefer particular host plants. These typically reversible traits do not explain the fundamental changes in the basic body plan.<br><br>Evolution by Natural Selection<br><br>The evolution of the myriad living creatures on Earth is a mystery that has fascinated scientists for centuries. Charles Darwin's natural selection theory is the most well-known explanation. This happens when individuals who are better-adapted are able to reproduce faster and longer than those who are less well-adapted. Over time, a community of well-adapted individuals expands and eventually forms a whole new species.<br><br>Natural selection is a cyclical process that is characterized by the interaction of three factors that are inheritance, variation and reproduction. Mutation and sexual reproduction increase genetic diversity in a species. Inheritance is the passing of a person's genetic characteristics to their offspring, which includes both recessive and dominant alleles. Reproduction is the process of generating viable, fertile offspring. This can be done through sexual or asexual methods.<br><br>Natural selection is only possible when all these elements are in harmony. For example the case where a dominant allele at a gene can cause an organism to live and reproduce more frequently than the recessive allele, the dominant allele will become more prominent within the population. If the allele confers a negative advantage to survival or lowers the fertility of the population, it will be eliminated. This process is self-reinforcing meaning that a species with a beneficial trait is more likely to survive and reproduce than one with an inadaptive trait. The more offspring that an organism has the better its fitness, which is measured by its ability to reproduce itself and live. People with desirable traits, like the long neck of Giraffes, or the bright white color patterns on male peacocks are more likely than others to survive and reproduce which eventually leads to them becoming the majority.<br><br>Natural selection is only an element in the population and not on individuals. This is a significant distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution, which states that animals acquire characteristics through use or neglect. If a giraffe stretches its neck to catch prey and the neck grows larger, then its offspring will inherit this characteristic. The length difference between generations will continue until the neck of the giraffe becomes too long to not breed with other giraffes.<br><br>Evolution through Genetic Drift<br><br>Genetic drift occurs when the alleles of a gene are randomly distributed in a group. Eventually, one of them will attain fixation (become so widespread that it can no longer be eliminated by natural selection), while other alleles fall to lower frequencies. In extreme cases, this leads to dominance of a single allele. The other alleles are essentially eliminated, and heterozygosity is reduced to zero. In a small population it could lead to the complete elimination of the recessive allele. This scenario is called the bottleneck effect. It is typical of an evolution process that occurs when a large number individuals migrate to form a group.<br><br>A phenotypic bottleneck could occur when the survivors of a catastrophe like an epidemic or mass hunting event, are condensed in a limited area. The remaining individuals will be largely homozygous for the dominant allele, meaning that they all have the same phenotype, and consequently have the same fitness traits. This situation could be caused by war, earthquakes or even a plague. The genetically distinct population, if it remains susceptible to genetic drift.<br><br>Walsh Lewens and Ariew utilize Lewens, Walsh, and Ariew use a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any departure from the expected values for variations in fitness. They provide a well-known example of twins that are genetically identical, share the exact same phenotype and yet one is struck by lightening and dies while the other lives and reproduces.<br><br>This kind of drift can play a significant part in the evolution of an organism. This isn't the only method for evolution. The primary alternative is a process called natural selection, in which the phenotypic diversity of the population is maintained through mutation and migration.<br><br>Stephens argues that there is a significant difference between treating the phenomenon of drift as a force, or an underlying cause, and treating other causes of evolution like mutation, selection and migration as causes or causes. He claims that a causal process explanation of drift allows us to distinguish it from other forces, and that this distinction is crucial. He argues further that drift is both direction, [https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_user.php?userid=11601289 ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ๋ฐ์นด๋ผ] [http://m.414500.cc/home.php?mod=space&uid=3716989 ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ์นด์ง๋ ธ ์ฌ์ดํธ] ([http://wzgroupup.hkhz76.badudns.cc/home.php?mod=space&uid=2370122 wzgroupup.hkhz76.badudns.cc said in a blog post]) i.e., it tends towards eliminating heterozygosity. It also has a size, which is determined by the size of the population.<br><br>Evolution through Lamarckism<br><br>When high school students study biology, they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution, commonly referred to as "Lamarckism" which means that simple organisms evolve into more complex organisms adopting traits that result from the organism's use and misuse. Lamarckism is illustrated through the giraffe's neck being extended to reach higher leaves in the trees. This would cause giraffes to give their longer necks to offspring, who then get taller.<br><br>Lamarck was a French zoologist and, in his inaugural lecture for his course on invertebrate zoology held at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th of May in 1802, he presented an original idea that fundamentally challenged previous thinking about organic transformation. According Lamarck, living organisms evolved from inanimate matter through a series of gradual steps. Lamarck was not the only one to suggest that this might be the case, but his reputation is widely regarded as being the one who gave the subject his first comprehensive and thorough treatment.<br><br>The prevailing story is that Lamarckism grew into an opponent to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection and that the two theories fought each other in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually prevailed, leading to what biologists refer to as the Modern Synthesis. This theory denies that traits acquired through evolution can be inherited and instead, it argues that organisms develop through the action of environmental factors, such as natural selection.<br><br>While Lamarck supported the notion of inheritance through acquired characters, and his contemporaries also paid lip-service to this notion however, it was not an integral part of any of their evolutionary theories. This is due in part to the fact that it was never tested scientifically.<br><br>It's been more than 200 year since Lamarck's birth, and in the age genomics there is a growing body of evidence that supports the heritability of acquired traits. This is referred to as "neo Lamarckism", or more generally epigenetic inheritance. It is a form of evolution that is just as relevant as the more popular Neo-Darwinian model.<br><br>Evolution by adaptation<br><br>One of the most common misconceptions about evolution is that it is driven by a type of struggle for survival. This is a false assumption and overlooks other forces that drive evolution. The struggle for survival is more accurately described as a struggle to survive in a specific environment, which can involve not only other organisms, but also the physical environment itself.<br><br>To understand how evolution functions it is important to understand what is adaptation. It is a feature that allows a living organism to survive in its environment and reproduce. It can be a physical feature, like feathers or fur. It could also be a trait of behavior, like moving towards shade during hot weather, or coming out to avoid the cold at night.<br><br>The ability of a living thing to extract energy from its surroundings and interact with other organisms as well as their physical environment is essential to its survival. The organism needs to have the right genes to create offspring, and it must be able to access enough food and other resources. The organism must be able to reproduce at the rate that is suitable for its specific niche.<br><br>These elements, in conjunction with mutation and gene flow can result in a change in the proportion of alleles (different forms of a gene) in a population's gene pool. Over time, this change in allele frequency can lead to the emergence of new traits and eventually new species.<br><br>Many of the features that we admire in animals and plants are adaptations, for example, [http://www.jsgml.top/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=1027814 ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ์ฝ๋ฆฌ์] lung or gills for removing oxygen from the air, fur or feathers for insulation and long legs for running away from predators, and camouflage to hide. To understand the concept of adaptation it is essential to discern between physiological and behavioral traits.<br><br>Physiological adaptations like thick fur or gills are physical traits, while behavioral adaptations, like the tendency to seek out companions or to move to the shade during hot weather, are not. It is also important to note that insufficient planning does not result in an adaptation. In fact, failing to think about the consequences of a behavior can make it ineffective even though it may appear to be logical or even necessary.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Fanomos Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Fanomos Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information