Editing
The Unknown Benefits Of Free Evolution
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
What is Free Evolution?<br><br>Free evolution is the idea that natural processes can lead to the development of organisms over time. This includes the creation of new species and the alteration of the appearance of existing species.<br><br>Many examples have been given of this, such as different varieties of stickleback fish that can be found in salt or fresh water, and walking stick insect varieties that favor specific host plants. These typically reversible traits do not explain the fundamental changes in the body's basic plans.<br><br>Evolution through Natural Selection<br><br>Scientists have been fascinated by the development of all living creatures that live on our planet for centuries. The most widely accepted explanation is Charles Darwin's natural selection process, an evolutionary process that is triggered when more well-adapted individuals live longer and reproduce more successfully than those that are less well-adapted. As time passes, the number of individuals who are well-adapted grows and eventually develops into an entirely new species.<br><br>Natural selection is a process that is cyclical and involves the interaction of 3 factors: variation, reproduction and inheritance. Variation is caused by mutation and sexual reproduction both of which increase the genetic diversity of an animal species. Inheritance is the passing of a person's genetic traits to their offspring which includes both dominant and recessive alleles. Reproduction is the process of producing fertile, [https://iblog.iup.edu/gyyt/2016/06/07/all-about-burnie-burns/comment-page-5517/ ๋ฌด๋ฃ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ] viable offspring, which includes both asexual and sexual methods.<br><br>Natural selection is only possible when all of these factors are in balance. If, for instance, a dominant gene allele causes an organism reproduce and last longer than the recessive allele The dominant allele is more prevalent in a population. But if the allele confers a disadvantage in survival or reduces fertility, it will disappear from the population. The process is self reinforcing which means that the organism with an adaptive trait will live and reproduce much more than those with a maladaptive trait. The more offspring that an organism has, the greater its fitness, which is measured by its ability to reproduce itself and survive. Individuals with favorable traits, like the long neck of giraffes, or bright white patterns on male peacocks are more likely than others to reproduce and survive which eventually leads to them becoming the majority.<br><br>Natural selection is only a force for populations, not on individuals. This is an important distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution, which states that animals acquire traits through use or neglect. If a giraffe extends its neck to reach prey and its neck gets larger, then its offspring will inherit this trait. The differences in neck length between generations will continue until the giraffe's neck becomes too long that it can no longer breed with other giraffes.<br><br>Evolution by Genetic Drift<br><br>In genetic drift, alleles at a gene may be at different frequencies within a population by chance events. Eventually, only one will be fixed (become common enough that it can no longer be eliminated through natural selection) and the other alleles diminish in frequency. In the extreme, this leads to one allele dominance. The other alleles are eliminated, and heterozygosity is reduced to zero. In a small population it could result in the complete elimination of the recessive gene. This is called a bottleneck effect, and it is typical of evolutionary process that occurs when a lot of people migrate to form a new population.<br><br>A phenotypic 'bottleneck' can also occur when the survivors of a catastrophe like an outbreak or mass hunt event are confined to a small area. The survivors will have an allele that is dominant and will have the same phenotype. This could be caused by earthquakes, war or [https://wikimapia.org/external_link?url=https://click4r.com/posts/g/18762083/why-we-do-we-love-evolution-free-experience-and-you-should-also ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ์ฌ๋กฏ๊ฒ์] [https://copyfriend4.bravejournal.net/10-tips-for-evolution-site-that-are-unexpected ์๋ณผ๋ฃจ์ ์นด์ง๋ ธ ์ฌ์ดํธ] - [https://infozillon.com/user/mouthspain2/ click through the following post] - even plagues. Regardless of the cause the genetically distinct population that remains is susceptible to genetic drift.<br><br>Walsh Lewens and Ariew utilize a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any departure from the expected values of different fitness levels. They provide a well-known instance of twins who are genetically identical, share identical phenotypes and yet one is struck by lightening and dies while the other lives and reproduces.<br><br>This type of drift can play a significant role in the evolution of an organism. But, it's not the only way to evolve. The main alternative is a process known as natural selection, where phenotypic variation in the population is maintained through mutation and migration.<br><br>Stephens claims that there is a significant difference between treating drift like an agent or cause and treating other causes such as selection mutation and migration as forces and causes. He claims that a causal-process explanation of drift lets us distinguish it from other forces, and this distinction is essential. He also argues that drift has a direction, that is, it tends to eliminate heterozygosity, and that it also has a magnitude, that is determined by the size of the population.<br><br>Evolution through Lamarckism<br><br>In high school, students study biology, they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution, often referred to as "Lamarckism which means that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms by adopting traits that are a product of the use and abuse of an organism. Lamarckism can be illustrated by an giraffe's neck stretching to reach higher branches in the trees. This causes the necks of giraffes that are longer to be passed onto their offspring who would then become taller.<br><br>Lamarck was a French Zoologist. In his opening lecture for his course on invertebrate zoology at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on 17 May 1802, he introduced a groundbreaking concept that radically challenged previous thinking about organic transformation. In his view, living things had evolved from inanimate matter through an escalating series of steps. Lamarck was not the first to suggest that this might be the case, but he is widely seen as having given the subject its first general and thorough treatment.<br><br>The dominant story is that Charles Darwin's theory on evolution by natural selection and Lamarckism were competing in the 19th Century. Darwinism ultimately prevailed which led to what biologists refer to as the Modern Synthesis. The theory argues that acquired traits are passed down from generation to generation and instead argues that organisms evolve through the selective influence of environmental elements, like Natural Selection.<br><br>Lamarck and his contemporaries supported the idea that acquired characters could be passed down to future generations. However, this idea was never a major part of any of their theories about evolution. This is partly because it was never tested scientifically.<br><br>It's been more than 200 years since Lamarck was born and in the age of genomics there is a huge amount of evidence to support the heritability of acquired characteristics. This is often referred to as "neo-Lamarckism" or, more frequently, epigenetic inheritance. It is a version of evolution that is just as valid as the more well-known Neo-Darwinian model.<br><br>Evolution by the process of adaptation<br><br>One of the most popular misconceptions about evolution is its being driven by a struggle to survive. This notion is not true and overlooks other forces that drive evolution. The fight for survival is better described as a struggle to survive in a particular environment. This may include not only other organisms but also the physical environment itself.<br><br>Understanding the concept of adaptation is crucial to understand evolution. The term "adaptation" refers to any characteristic that allows a living organism to survive in its environment and reproduce. It could be a physiological feature, such as fur or feathers, or a behavioral trait such as a tendency to move to the shade during hot weather or coming out at night to avoid cold.<br><br>An organism's survival depends on its ability to extract energy from the environment and to interact with other organisms and their physical environments. The organism must possess the right genes to create offspring, and it must be able to find sufficient food and other resources. The organism must be able to reproduce at the rate that is suitable for its particular niche.<br><br>These factors, in conjunction with gene flow and mutations, can lead to an alteration in the ratio of different alleles in the population's gene pool. This change in allele frequency can result in the emergence of new traits, and eventually new species in the course of time.<br><br>Many of the features we find appealing in animals and plants are adaptations. For instance lung or gills that extract oxygen from air feathers and fur as insulation and long legs to get away from predators and camouflage for hiding. To comprehend adaptation, it is important to discern between physiological and behavioral characteristics.<br><br>Physiological adaptations, such as the thick fur or gills are physical traits, while behavioral adaptations, such as the desire to find friends or to move into the shade in hot weather, are not. It is also important to note that the absence of planning doesn't cause an adaptation. A failure to consider the effects of a behavior even if it seems to be rational, may cause it to be unadaptive.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Fanomos Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Fanomos Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information