8 Tips To Improve Your Pragmatic Ranking Game: Revision history

25 January 2025

• curprev 15:1615:16, 25 January 2025‎ IsisMadrigal94 talk contribs‎ m 9,658 bytes −85‎ No edit summary undo

24 January 2025

• curprev 15:2215:22, 24 January 2025‎ DulcieHandfield talk contribs‎ m 9,743 bytes +222‎ No edit summary undo

20 January 2025

• curprev 02:2902:29, 20 January 2025‎ ClemmieK34 talk contribs‎ m 9,521 bytes −61‎ No edit summary undo

14 January 2025

• curprev 15:1715:17, 14 January 2025‎ LeonoraSinclaire talk contribs‎ m 9,582 bytes +201‎ No edit summary undo

12 January 2025

• curprev 08:1208:12, 12 January 2025‎ CerysSbu8789559 talk contribs‎ m 9,381 bytes −122‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 12 January 2025‎ MarcelaStretton talk contribs‎ m 9,503 bytes −126‎ No edit summary undo

8 January 2025

• curprev 09:4509:45, 8 January 2025‎ KatherinN90 talk contribs‎ m 9,629 bytes −144‎ No edit summary undo

5 January 2025

• curprev 15:1415:14, 5 January 2025‎ VJUSanora3 talk contribs‎ 9,773 bytes +9,773‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance implementation research and practice, it is crucial to have measures that are both practical and psychometrically valid. This study aimed to establish a pragmatic measure of success by a stakeholder-led process. A systematic literature review and semi-structured interview with stakeholders resulted in 47 practical rating categories.<br><br>A ranked list of the most influential authors in pragmatics was created using citation data from..."