The Reasons Pragmatic Ranking Is Harder Than You Imagine: Revision history

16 January 2025

• curprev 00:5800:58, 16 January 2025‎ ClariceCrumley9 talk contribs‎ m 9,430 bytes +120‎ No edit summary undo

13 January 2025

• curprev 19:4819:48, 13 January 2025‎ GHSFredrick talk contribs‎ m 9,310 bytes −105‎ No edit summary undo

12 January 2025

• curprev 19:4519:45, 12 January 2025‎ MaryanneStandish talk contribs‎ m 9,415 bytes −106‎ No edit summary undo

9 January 2025

• curprev 13:4213:42, 9 January 2025‎ LavadaCable584 talk contribs‎ m 9,521 bytes −252‎ No edit summary undo

5 January 2025

• curprev 18:5518:55, 5 January 2025‎ ConcettaZamora talk contribs‎ 9,773 bytes +9,773‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance research on implementation and practice, it is crucial to have measures that are both pragmatic and psychometrically sound. This study sought to develop pragmatic measurement criteria through a collaborative stakeholder-based process. A systematic review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder meetings provided 47 criteria for rating.<br><br>Based on the data from Scopus WOS and Lens A list of the top pragmatics authors was creat..."