These Are Myths And Facts Behind Pragmatic Ranking: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

25 January 2025

23 January 2025

10 January 2025

  • curprev 23:2523:25, 10 January 2025‎ RheaWetherspoon talk contribs‎ m 9,558 bytes +10‎ No edit summary undo
  • curprev 19:2919:29, 10 January 2025‎ MauricioO76 talk contribs‎ 9,548 bytes +9,548‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>Advancing implementation research and practice requires measures that are psychometrically strong and pragmatic. This study was designed to establish practical measurement criteria using the collaboration of stakeholder groups. A systematic literature review and semi-structured discussions with stakeholders produced 47 pragmatic rating categories.<br><br>Based on the data from Scopus WOS and Lens A ranking of the top authors in pragmatics has bee..."
Retrieved from "https://fanomoswiki.nlr.nl/index.php?title=These_Are_Myths_And_Facts_Behind_Pragmatic_Ranking"